Women should be allocated a certain percentage?
In modern society, we can see some women leaders in countries and companies. And the rate of women leader is growing more and more and they are doing quite well leading their groups or countries. For example, the prime minister of German have been chosen as the number one woman leader who has influenced on the world by Forbes magazine for four years and the CEO of HP, Fiorina was chosen by the former CEO for overcoming the financial crisis. And they were quite successful leaders and CEOs so some people claim that companies should allocate a certain percentage of high-level position for women.
But I think this opinion is controversial and we have to consider carefully before accepting that. For this reason, first, all of women weren't that successful. For example, Fiorina looked like being adventurous and really she was. She merged HP with COMPAQ but this didn't show remarkable result because the computer business was changing from hardware to software and HP never overtook DELL's profit.
Second, if companies are required to allocate a certain percentage for women, they could be promoted higher than men who are more competent and this can decrease the men's motivation for a project or work and this causes the reduction of productivity.
And the last, reverse discrimination is for the people who don't have any chance although they have tried, are educated and are very competent. This is not the problem of reverse discrimination. Women can have oppotunities to be promoted and to have high-level position if they have the ability to get that because that is not using the muscle power.
Women have their own merits and men also do. Generally, women are more stable and delicate than men. If these traits are effective to survive this high competitive society, maybe there are more women in high-level positions. My point is that let the people who have ability get the promotion. I think that is the only way to be more effective and to survive in this competitive society.
In modern society, we can see some women leaders in countries and companies. And the rate of women leader is growing more and more and they are doing quite well leading their groups or countries. For example, the prime minister of German have been chosen as the number one woman leader who has influenced on the world by Forbes magazine for four years and the CEO of HP, Fiorina was chosen by the former CEO for overcoming the financial crisis. And they were quite successful leaders and CEOs so some people claim that companies should allocate a certain percentage of high-level position for women.
But I think this opinion is controversial and we have to consider carefully before accepting that. For this reason, first, all of women weren't that successful. For example, Fiorina looked like being adventurous and really she was. She merged HP with COMPAQ but this didn't show remarkable result because the computer business was changing from hardware to software and HP never overtook DELL's profit.
Second, if companies are required to allocate a certain percentage for women, they could be promoted higher than men who are more competent and this can decrease the men's motivation for a project or work and this causes the reduction of productivity.
And the last, reverse discrimination is for the people who don't have any chance although they have tried, are educated and are very competent. This is not the problem of reverse discrimination. Women can have oppotunities to be promoted and to have high-level position if they have the ability to get that because that is not using the muscle power.
Women have their own merits and men also do. Generally, women are more stable and delicate than men. If these traits are effective to survive this high competitive society, maybe there are more women in high-level positions. My point is that let the people who have ability get the promotion. I think that is the only way to be more effective and to survive in this competitive society.
'외국어 > Essay' 카테고리의 다른 글
| After reading 'David Copperfield' (0) | 2010.05.26 |
|---|---|
| Comparison (0) | 2010.05.25 |
| Essay (0) | 2010.05.24 |
| Essay (0) | 2010.05.22 |
| Essay (0) | 2010.03.01 |
